Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Film // Jim // 15th August 2005
I’m on the train back from London and a man who can only be named as “Craig” (due to his desire to avoid Interpol for at least another month) phones to ask whether I would like to join him and some friends to see the new version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
This sounds like fun so its back home and
a dash up to the neo-something or other splendour of the Leamington Apollo – the
cinema where they like to tut loudly and say “You have to pay for that
drink at a different till”.
Fortunately the film is on in the big screen, rather than one of the small
shed-like efforts where you can’t hear a bloody thing and develop deep
vein thrombosis before the fucking trailers are over.
Ahem.
Anyway the main reasons
most people will want to see this film are:
A - Everyone has read the book when they were a kid.
B - Everyone likes Johnny Depp.
C and TCF: Faithful, mean spirited
In terms of point A Tim Burton has probably been a touch more faithful to the book than the drugged up 70s version with Gene Wilder, there are no flowery incidental songs and although things get pretty sucrose at points it is still quite dark and mean spirited. The film unfolds an excellent, dark, explanatory first segment before steaming through the main cautionary plot: a bunch of mostly repellent children are horribly undone by their own character faults.
Turning to point B, Depp gives another enjoyably mad, over the top performance that you can’t quite picture anyone else managing. Having done a two-hour long Keith Richards impression in Pirates of the Caribbean (and what an awful film that would have been without him), here he has been described as doing a Michael Jackson. However I think a more accurate comparison is Jack Nicholson in the Shining.
In every scene Depp’s Willy Wonka has a manic look in his eyes that suggests that being locked up in a cavernous factory with only a bunch of identical midgets and some repressed father issues for company has taken its toll. All work and no play makes Willy a dull boy and at times I was expecting an axe to appear so that the pesky kids could be finished off in double quick time without the need for the elaborate morality traps that befall the little bastards. It is worth noting that he is nearly matched by the overly competitive, former baton twirling mother in the track-suit - very scary indeed.
Depp: Manic eyes, axe?
As you would expect of a Tim Burton movie the film looks amazing, all big sets and epic spectacle, as with most films of recent times the CGI goes completely mad here and there but it is mostly put to good use, personally I thought the Squirrels were ace.
A lot of kids films now like to squeeze in knowing references to adult humour or other films to keep the parents happy. C&TCF keeps away from this trend (I was a bit disappointed they didn’t sneak at least one “Let’s go up the fudge tunnel” in) except for the TV sequence, which is a huge post-modern Kubrick/2001 homage that I lapped up like the sad movie geek I am.
The other incredibly post-modern element of the whole experience was the spoiled little brat sitting behind me, kicking the back of my seat and demanding ice-cream and pop-corn from her feckless mother. There’s never a crowd of homicidal squirrels and singing half-arses about when you really them is there?
Charlie and the hastily added links...
- The official movie site
- Publicity, games etc. you know the drill
- Tales of the unexpected
- Info on Roald Dahls darker stories from that TV programme with the mad music and the dancing naked woman in the titles
Comments
I’ve not seen this version yet; but the original had the TV bit with the fully white background to it that reminded me of THX1138. Inbetween all the sex and drugs references - particularly the bit in the tunnel where Gene Wilder seems to go off on one. And then says “candy is dandy, but liquor is quicker”, probably referring to The Ladies, the dirty devil.
steve : 21/08/2005 00:04:36
I must be missing something here because I loved the Gene Wilder version but never picked up naughty references to bad things....just too innocent..
But I did also enjoy the Johnny Depp version. No, I don’t fancy him (he has girly hands) though I think he’s one of the best actors around. It was creepier than the Gene Wilder version which was good, but the oompa loompa’s songs were shite.
Vanessa : 07/10/2005 17:00:45